Survey compiled by Sonya Clark
On the first day of the “Creating a New Craft Culture” conference, Sonya Clark distributed survey forms containing 32 questions culled from over 150 suggestions. Clark, who is the chair of material studies at Virginia Commonwealth University, hoped the survey would help take the pulse of the attendees, gauging how they felt about “craft” as a subject, verb and object. The survey results were presented by Clark at the end of the day on Saturday and helped frame Clark’s Conference Conclusion.
Survey Results
1. Is the ubiquity of craft media in the world a hindrance to its market value?
Yes: 41% No: 59%
2. Is the interface between craft, design and art moving in a positive direction?
Yes: 89% No: 11%
Voted one of the MOST relevant questions
3. Should craft become the example of critical-making (parallel to critical-thinking) in our culture?
Yes: 84% No: 16%
Voted one of the MOST relevant questions
4. Do you find American Craft Magazine relevant to you personally?
Yes: 71% No: 29%
Voted one of the LEAST relevant questions
5. Have you witnessed a change in the way craft is taught?
Yes: 82% No: 18%
6. Has the academic craft community abandoned the traditionally educated craft community?
Yes: 50% No: 50%
7. Is the craft community invested in broader notions of crafts that come from diverse communities?
Yes: 72% No: 28%
8. Do you value the contributions of traditionally or non-academically trained artists in the field?
Yes: 50% No: 50%
9. Are traditional artists in the field well represented in our galleries, museums and/or magazines?
Yes: 76% No: 24%
10. Do you have any formal education in the craft history?
Yes: 92% No: 8%
11. Do you have any formal education in the craft theory?
Yes: 67% No: 33%
12. Do you see the preservation of craft traditions as a forward-looking strategy?
Yes: 45% No: 55%
13. Is there a difference between the way you use the word “craft” and the way you define it?
Yes: 81% No: 19%
14. Should we curate, collect and exhibit DIY in museums?
Yes: 96% No: 4%
Voted one of the LEAST relevant questions
15. Have we reached a point in which we can say we have codified Studio Craft as a movement?
Yes: 62% No: 38%
16. Do you value craft that embraces its history and then challenges it?
Yes: 72% No: 18%
Voted one of the MOST relevant questions
17. Would craft be better off if it more actively and directly engaged societal needs?
Yes: 76% No: 24%
18. Does DIY present a threat to craft taught in academia?
Yes: 12% No: 88%
Voted one of the LEAST relevant questions
19. Do you think of craft as a field?
Yes: 81% No: 19%
20. Do you think of craft as a set of fields?
Yes: 80% No: 20%
21. Do you use craft to describe technique?
Yes: 89% No: 11%
22. Do you use “craft” to describe skill?
Yes: 90% No: 10%
23. Do you use “craft” to describe conceptual approaches?
Yes: 74% No: 26%
24. Do you use “craft” to describe the historical precedents evident in work?
Yes: 81% No: 19%
25. Do you describe something as “craft” depending on the narrative of the object?
Yes: 52% No: 48%
26. Do you use “craft” based on the training or academic pedigree of the artist?
Yes: 34% No: 66%
27. Do you define objects, ideas and techniques as craft regardless of the maker’s definition?
Yes: 78% No: 22%
28. Has the word craft acquired any new meanings in the last ten years?
Yes: 85% No: 15%
29. Does the field need to embrace new technologies as a whole?
Yes: 79% No: 21%
30. Does craft mean too many things to be a useful?
Yes: 46% No: 54%
31. Does craft need to expand its definition to be more inclusive?
Yes: 58% No: 42%
32. Does the democratization of making add to the value of craft in the marketplace?
Yes: 69% No: 31%
Voted one of the MOST relevant questions
What questions are missing from this survey?
Does contemporary art need to expand its definition to include craft?
Is there an irony in DIY as a marketed idea, when there are already the books to explain the ways to do something?
Is the American Craft Council relevant?
Has the consumer-oriented craft fair influenced the advancement or decline of the field as an investigation of materials?
Does digital culture play a role in your definition of craft?
How do we tell our story of the last 50 years of contemporary craft and how do we do it soon enough? The narrative is crucial.
How does democratization of craft discourage mediocrity?
How do we use craft to help our children become more successful citizens?
Does craft need to be a category?
Are you a craftsperson or an artist?
Can you be a full-time craftsperson and have a reasonable financial lifestyle?
Does craft need the marketplace for the field to survive/grow?
Do you think that many makers would be better suited to a conversation of the real connection of the hand and brain and its link to our sanity?
What is the impact of DIY on craft?
How can the “craft” culture be less insular, exclusive, leisurely and more socially radical, more integrative of diverse populations and diverse notions of making?
What is the evolving role of the gallery in the digital marketplace?
Why is the field still focused on semantics and definitions? Is it important to continue to engage in this debate?
How does craft impact or enhance the lives of people (makers, collectors, etc.)?
How can we have fun, work together and be more inclusive as crafters/artists, and stop labeling?
Do you think craftsmen/women/children need to develop new ways to be responsible to the environment?
As materially immersive artists, do we have a responsibility towards sustainability issues?
Is craft always going to be defined in relation to the individual? Where is the collective?
Do craft people need to define themselves as anti-establishment?
For Sonya Clark’s interpretation of the survey results, download the audio podcast of this session or listen online.



























